Financhill
Sell
49

PRGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$56.43
Seasonality move :
0.04%
Day range:
$53.71 - $57.46
52-week range:
$48.00 - $70.56
Dividend yield:
1.24%
P/E ratio:
43.75x
P/S ratio:
3.11x
P/B ratio:
5.62x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
821.2K
1-year change:
10.95%
Market cap:
$2.4B
Revenue:
$753.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.29

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PRGS
Progress Software
$235.6M $1.06 35.66% 238.31% $72.43
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
AUR
Aurora Innovation
$200K -$0.12 -100% -11.77% $8.45
CTLP
Cantaloupe
$79.8M $0.11 17.58% 75% $12.50
VEEA
Veea
-- -- -- -- --
VRRM
Verra Mobility
$216.9M $0.29 3.44% 68.89% $29.08
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PRGS
Progress Software
$56.44 $72.43 $2.4B 43.75x $0.18 1.24% 3.11x
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings
$0.52 -- $622.1K -- $0.00 0% 0.01x
AUR
Aurora Innovation
$5.91 $8.45 $10.3B -- $0.00 0% 140.55x
CTLP
Cantaloupe
$7.27 $12.50 $531M 36.35x $0.00 0% 1.89x
VEEA
Veea
$1.50 -- $53.5M -- $0.00 0% --
VRRM
Verra Mobility
$21.69 $29.08 $3.5B 127.59x $0.00 0% 4.14x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PRGS
Progress Software
77.61% 1.159 63.69% 0.67x
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings
395.6% 6.300 833.44% 0.23x
AUR
Aurora Innovation
-- 2.023 -- --
CTLP
Cantaloupe
16.1% 1.028 5.31% 0.97x
VEEA
Veea
259.01% 0.000 5.62% 0.14x
VRRM
Verra Mobility
79.6% 0.664 26.8% 1.70x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PRGS
Progress Software
$191.8M $42.7M 3.8% 13.14% 13.33% $67.7M
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings
$2.1M -$1.1M -1933.03% -- 78.73% $650.8K
AUR
Aurora Innovation
-- -$199M -- -- -- -$150M
CTLP
Cantaloupe
$30.7M $6.2M 6.93% 8.34% 8.63% -$3.8M
VEEA
Veea
$35.7K -$1.2M -- -- -64857.4% -$20M
VRRM
Verra Mobility
$208.5M $53.7M 2.17% 7.63% -17.72% $21.6M

Progress Software vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PRGS or ATCH?

    AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of -15.28%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    80.58% $0.24 $1.9B
    ATCH
    AtlasClear Holdings
    77.07% -$66.74 $7.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About PRGS or ATCH?

    Progress Software has a consensus price target of $72.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.33%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 173611.6%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Progress Software.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    4 2 0
    ATCH
    AtlasClear Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is PRGS or ATCH More Risky?

    Progress Software has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRGS or ATCH?

    Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRGS or ATCH?

    Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$419.7K. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.75x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.11x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    3.11x 43.75x $238M $10.9M
    ATCH
    AtlasClear Holdings
    0.01x -- $2.7M -$419.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns PRGS or AUR?

    Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of --. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    80.58% $0.24 $1.9B
    AUR
    Aurora Innovation
    -- -$0.11 --
  • What do Analysts Say About PRGS or AUR?

    Progress Software has a consensus price target of $72.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.33%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 43.08%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Progress Software.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    4 2 0
    AUR
    Aurora Innovation
    3 4 0
  • Is PRGS or AUR More Risky?

    Progress Software has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRGS or AUR?

    Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRGS or AUR?

    Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$193M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.75x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.11x versus 140.55x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    3.11x 43.75x $238M $10.9M
    AUR
    Aurora Innovation
    140.55x -- -- -$193M
  • Which has Higher Returns PRGS or CTLP?

    Cantaloupe has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of 6.75%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    80.58% $0.24 $1.9B
    CTLP
    Cantaloupe
    41.67% $0.07 $229.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About PRGS or CTLP?

    Progress Software has a consensus price target of $72.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.33%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 71.94%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Progress Software.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    4 2 0
    CTLP
    Cantaloupe
    5 0 0
  • Is PRGS or CTLP More Risky?

    Progress Software has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRGS or CTLP?

    Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRGS or CTLP?

    Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.75x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 36.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.11x versus 1.89x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    3.11x 43.75x $238M $10.9M
    CTLP
    Cantaloupe
    1.89x 36.35x $73.7M $5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PRGS or VEEA?

    Veea has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of -65748.98%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    80.58% $0.24 $1.9B
    VEEA
    Veea
    70.41% -$1.49 $5M
  • What do Analysts Say About PRGS or VEEA?

    Progress Software has a consensus price target of $72.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.33%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Progress Software has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Progress Software is more attractive than Veea.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    4 2 0
    VEEA
    Veea
    0 0 0
  • Is PRGS or VEEA More Risky?

    Progress Software has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRGS or VEEA?

    Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRGS or VEEA?

    Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $50.7K. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than Veea's net income of -$33.3M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.75x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.11x versus -- for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    3.11x 43.75x $238M $10.9M
    VEEA
    Veea
    -- -- $50.7K -$33.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PRGS or VRRM?

    Verra Mobility has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Progress Software's net margin of -30.09%. Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    80.58% $0.24 $1.9B
    VRRM
    Verra Mobility
    94.15% -$0.41 $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PRGS or VRRM?

    Progress Software has a consensus price target of $72.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.33%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $29.08 which suggests that it could grow by 34.09%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Progress Software.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    4 2 0
    VRRM
    Verra Mobility
    4 2 0
  • Is PRGS or VRRM More Risky?

    Progress Software has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.226%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRGS or VRRM?

    Progress Software has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progress Software pays 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRGS or VRRM?

    Progress Software quarterly revenues are $238M, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $221.5M. Progress Software's net income of $10.9M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M. Notably, Progress Software's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.75x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 127.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progress Software is 3.11x versus 4.14x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRGS
    Progress Software
    3.11x 43.75x $238M $10.9M
    VRRM
    Verra Mobility
    4.14x 127.59x $221.5M -$66.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Nio Vs Rivian Stock, Which EV Is Best?
Nio Vs Rivian Stock, Which EV Is Best?

Nio (NYSE:NIO) and Rivian (NASDAQ:RIVN) are two EV startups that…

Is Sweetgreen Stock Worth Holding For the Next Five Years?
Is Sweetgreen Stock Worth Holding For the Next Five Years?

Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) is an up-and-coming quick service restaurant chain focused…

What Do I Need to Know About Alcoa Stock?
What Do I Need to Know About Alcoa Stock?

Alcoa (AA) is a global leader in aluminum production. Based…

Stock Ideas

Sell
31
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x

Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x

Sell
33
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.4T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
24
GDXU alert for Apr 8

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 1.93% over the past day.

Buy
75
SOXS alert for Apr 8

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is down 7.07% over the past day.

Buy
51
YANG alert for Apr 7

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares [YANG] is up 25.64% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock